Will Trump Prevail in 2020? (Checkers vs Chess)

 

The real battle has begun! Despite all the rhetoric from both sides, there is no doubt there are legitimate concerns about the integrity of the 2020 election. And I am pretty sure it will all shake out in the end. The only question: which candidate will prevail and be sworn into office on January 20, 2021?  

For the answer, we need to look into things that happened before as well as during the election. We also must look closely at the minds behind each. And keep in mind that President Trump quietly issued a consequential Executive Order in September of 2018 concerning election interference. That said, here is my take:

Early in 2020 the Democrat party began using the COVID scare to warrant a push for "mail-in ballots" that could be used fraudulently. That, in and of itself would not be a huge problem if it was done properly, requiring they be requested (not mailed out willy-nilly with no accountability) and requiring verification that the person  casting the ballot is legally entitled to do so. The problem became apparent to Republicans that mail-in ballots would be impossible to be vetted properly. 

 The Constitution clearly states repeatedly that only citizens may vote. That is not a suggestion, but a requirement. As with any requirement there must be a method to insure compliance. In other words, by default the Constitution declares citizenship must be checked prior to voting. Otherwise, the requirement becomes toothless - moot. This will become an important point if this election goes to the United States Supreme Court.

Now, realize that President Trump immediately called out the potential for fraud with mail-in ballots (which are different from absentee ballots which must be requested and verified). At that point, anyone familiar with Donald Trump's uncanny ability to think and plan ahead - trademark of his successes in life - well, those people understand that while others play checkers, Trump is playing chess. Here is how it likely would go down:

When mail-in ballots were first brought into the mix, Trump instantly began planning advance moves - he considered everything the Democrats were doing and planning, and was planning moves to counter every move Democrats were likely to make - sometimes even before Democrats themselves made their moves. Trump ANTICIPATED what they would do.  That is what Trump does. It is how he has been so successful in business, and in dealing with the economy, China and even peace in the Middle East. He is always a step or two ahead of his opponent.

Trump knew "the steal" was on. He knew the Democrats would  try to steal the election with fraudulent votes. (If you do not think he was ready for that, you need to take a smart pill.) But it would not be enough to simply catch them in the act. Trump was likely determined to destroy any future plans by EITHER party to compromise election integrity. His love for America exceeds his love of any party. As usual, thinking to the future. So, he let it play out. He COULD have stopped it with an Executive Order that would pass muster with SCOTUS, as most mail-in ballots and changing dates etc. were in violation of state laws.

Here is what Donald Trump and his lawyers know that most Democrats - even most Americans - do not know: if an election is contested and there is any evidence of fraud, SCOTUS would be called in to make a determination. (NOTE: this is why Trump and Republicans were so intent on pushing Amy Coney Barrett through the confirmation process so quickly - she is a Constitutional scholar, and always finds in favor of the Constitution as written).

So, the election is contested, and proof of fraud is discovered. It goes to SCOTUS. In such a case, the Constitution allows for SCOTUS to turn it over to the peoples' representatives - the House - to choose who will be President.

And if you are thinking that this would put the decision up to a Democrat majority in the House, then you are making the same mistake Speaker Pelosi is making. The Constitution clearly states that if no clear winner is determined, and it goes to the House, each STATE (not each representative) gets ONE vote. There can only be a maximum of 50 votes cast - and each vote is cast by a member representing his/her state. And the majority of states are in Republican hands.

The majority of states are Republican, unlike the majority of House members. This means California and New York will have only one vote each, just like South Dakota and Alabama.

The short take: Trump plans ahead - while Democrats play checkers, Trump is playing chess. He was likely way ahead at every step, and the eventual outcome preordained. 

That is not to say it will go down as planned, but it is a likely scenario, given with what we know of Donald Trump - the man who wins every fight that counts (so far). It could fall apart if Republican representatives do not show up to vote. But it appears Trump took all the rights steps, at the right time, and gave Democrats enough rope to hang themselves.

But one question may never be answered with certainty - who DID America vote for? Frankly, it appears obvious to those who look at who else the voters actually voted for - Republicans lost ZERO seats in Congress, and actually gained seats in the House. They gained a state governor. The people, by a large margin were voting a Republican ticket. Is it even plausible they would vote a red ticket and yet cast their vote for a Democrat at the TOP of that ticket? Common sense and critical thinking tells us that is a statistical improbability.

 

/

Earning the "Black" Vote - Facts the Media Won't Tell You

 

Traveling through VA I noticed that most Biden-Harris signs are put up by people of color. This does not surprise me. What DOES surprise me is "why". So, being a person who believes in researching facts, I stopped at several homes with Biden signs, and asked why they were supporting Biden. In every case, whether the residents were black or white, I got the same response - President Donald J Trump is "racist" and he's a "Russian agent".

Most people know both those are false, as research (other than from the media or Twitter) proves. I would then ask them, "Can I ask you one question?" Then I would ask, "Can you name even ONE THING that Trump has actually DONE that has hurt the black community? Has he passed anything that does them harm? Or can you name even ONE THING, specifically, that either Biden or Harris has ever done to HELP the black community?"

After listening to some rather non-answers I ask them if they are aware that Trump is investing 1.5 trillion dollars into "opportunity zones" to benefit poor, minority neighborhoods, for better schools, more businesses, more jobs? Obama-Biden COULD have done that in their 8 years, but they didn't.

Then I asked if they were aware that it was Joe Biden who wrote and pushed the 1994 crime bill that BY DESIGN incarcerated tens of thousands of black people for 20-life for minor crimes and first offenses, and Kamala Harris used that to put thousands of black people into prison, and that she even withheld exculpatory evidence that would have freed two blacks on death row - but did not release that evidence until AFTER they were executed?

I then reminded them that it was Trump who began setting those people free under his First Step Act of criminal justice reform. Obama-Biden had 8 years to do that - but did not.

 Then I asked if they were aware that historically black colleges and universities (HBCU's) had to go to Congress EVERY YEAR and literally beg for funding? And did they know it was Trump who decided to fund them for 10 years, automatically, and even provided more funding than they requested? Obama-Biden COULD have done that in their 8 years - but did not.

Then I ask if they aware that in the '80's and 90's when black entrepreneurs could not get funding, that it was Donald Trump who loaned them the money they needed? And were they aware that when those black business men tried paying their loans back, Donald Trump tore up their checks and told them, "Just go out and make a success of your business"?

Or did they know that when he purchased Mar-a-Lago he wanted to open it to everyone, including blacks and Jews, but due to pressure from other area resorts, the city of Palm Beach told him he could not? He sued the city and won, which forced all the other resorts to also allow blacks and Jews.

Then I asked the most important question: does that sound like a racist, or a Russian agent?

Judging from the responses I got, I think some of those Biden signs will be gone when I drive by tomorrow...

(Brought to you by IntelliBiz)

/

Media MUST Cover Biden-China Story Or They Die

 

As of 10/22/2020 the mainstream media - New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, MSNBC, ABC, CBS NBC and NPR - as well as social media - Facebook, Twitter, Google and Instagram - have pretty much refused to cover the story of the century: the Bidens apparent pay-for-play with China. In fact, they even try to push disinformation by claiming the entire story is either unsubstantiated (it has been verified by the Intelligence Agencies) or is "Russian disinformation - which the ODNI and FBI have already stated is not true. Think about this - our most powerful and dangerous enemy - China - has a ton of blackmail they can use against someone who could become the President of the United States. And whereas China has already decreed they intend to take over the world by 2035, that goal would be easily met if America's president is compromised. Trust me - you do NOT want to live under a communist regime.

In other words, the mainstream and social media outlets are willfully and intentionally lying to the American people about the Biden family selling out America to the Communist Chinese Party (CCP). In effect, they appear to be committing treason in order to cover up the treason of their favored presidential candidate.

Authorities have Hunter Bidens laptop with tens of thousands of texts, emails, photos and they have been verified as real and legitimate. They have eye witnesses & partners of the Bidens who, in turn, testified and produced proof positive of the Biden corruption in selling out America to the Chinese communists. There has not been another story of this magnitude in the entire history of this nation.

This puts the media in a dangerous box, because this story is far to immense and backed by far too much empirical evidence, and they will be caught between having to report the story fairly, completely and expeditiously, which would destroy the Democrat party they support, or if they refuse to cover it, they will become extinct, themselves - no person on Earth will ever trust them again. No advertisers will pay them for advertising. The "legacy media" and social media will be dead. They will have committed organizational suicide. As it is, they have already damaged themselves, their integrity and credibility nearly to the point of no return.

A fair warning to ALL media - you had better begin reporting fairly, honestly and without bias beginning yesterday, or you will destroy yourselves completely and history will not be favorable to you.

You have been warned!

(Brought to you by IntelliBiz)/

2nd Installment

Read the 2nd installment of the Hunter Biden-China saga

 

https://nypost.com/2020/10/15/emails-reveal-how-hunter-biden-tried-to-cash-in-big-with-chinese-firm/?utm_source=twitter_sitebuttons

Fixing the Dysfunctional Media

 

 

Anyone who has been paying attention knows that the mainstream and social media platforms are out of control. They are heavily biased to the point of being downright dishonest. 

The problem lies in the perception of the First Amendment that guarantees freedom of the press. The media assumes that means they can say whatever they want, and can cover up important news if it helps their narrative. But they are wrong.

 Every Constitutional Right comes with the obligation to not abuse it. For the same reason a person may not yell "fire" in a crowded theater that is not on fire, it is just as wrong to intentionally publish fake news, publish improperly sourced stories or censor news the media wants to cover up - which is "lying by omission".

The media is provided a lot of leeway by virtue of being the press. But that does not give them the right to lie, or to cover up news. On the contrary - because they are blessed with extra protections, they must be held to a higher standard. When they fail to hold themselves to that standard, they abuse their right of free speech, and in so doing they harm the general public at large. And when someone harms another, there are grounds for legal action.

I would suggest it is high time for some enterprising attorney to put forth a class action suit against the media platforms designed to force the media to act responsibly; to not intentionally mislead  the public either by pushing fake news that is not PROPERLY sourced, or by covering up news stories simply because they do not fit a narrative. That attorney can use the same premise as yelling "fire" in a crowded building - that every right comes with the responsibility to not abuse it; to apply it fairly and honestly.

Because anything less causes harm to our entire society. 

 If Congress can place restrictions on the 2nd Amendment, do NOT tell me they cannot so so for the 1st.

 

(Brought to you by IntelliBiz)

Hunter Biden Email (alleged)

 

Proof That the Media IS the Enemy of the People

 

Back in the 40's & 50's there was a cartoon on Saturday mornings. It featured a dog, a cat and a parrot. And like most cartoons, it was designed to teach children an important message.

It went like this:

The parrot is not happy that the dog and cat get along so well. He was reading a copy of "Mein Kampf", by Adolf Hitler which gave him an idea. He flies down from his lofty perch to the dog sleeping near the fireplace. He wakes the dog and whispers in his ear and points to the cat, resting peaceably in the easy chair. He tells the dog that the cat is planning to attack him in his sleep, and claw him up. He then flies over to the cat and, pointing to the dog, whispers in the feline's ear that the dog is planning to attack him in his sleep and chew him up.

The parrot  returns to his perch, above the coming fray.

Now eyeing each other with suspicion, the dog and cat become wary of each other, and it only took an accident - a spark from the fireplace - to get the dog to smack the cat, thinking it was responsible. Naturally, the cat fought back and a real, full-blown battle began as they tore each other to shreds.

 But in the fray, they bumped into the parrot's perch, and the book fell to the floor. Upon reading the title they realized they had become victims of the parrot's propaganda, and they began beating the crap out of the parrot.

In America the media was unhappy that people were getting along fairly well lately, which results in "slow news days", resulting in loss of revenue for the media, which makes money and gains its power from controversy and chaos ("dirty laundry"). With the help of some powerful, influential politicians on the left who support socialism and were using a "divide and conquer" regimen to consolidate power, the media began a narrative designed to pit people against one another. Black vs white; rich vs poor; women vs men - the list goes on. The purpose for the media, of course, was to create the hate and chaos they needed for selling their news - subscriptions and ratings - which, in turn, rakes in advertising revenue.

In short, the media is the parrot. We are the dogs and cats. And the push for socialism is the book, Mein Kampf, only today it is the Cloward-Piven model for instilling socialism, which in turn is based on Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals" which, in turn, is founded in the Communist Manifesto.

For those unfamiliar with the Cloward-Piven strategy, this is a summary:

The following "rules" were put forth by Cloward and Piven in 1966, both professors at the Columbia University School of Social Work -

 
Creating a social state involves taking control in eight areas. The first is the most important because it involves everyone and is a matter of life and death. As you read through these (and hopefully think about them), ask yourself who is pushing these:


Healthcare– Control healthcare and you control the people. (Ring a bell?)


Poverty – Increase the poverty level as high as possible, then provide the basics for them from the government teat, because it is easier to control poor people - they won't bite the hand that feeds them. (ring another bell?)


Debt – Literally bankrupt the treasury.  Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty. (A cacaphony of bells)


Gun Control – Remove the ability of the people to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state (Bells, bells, bells)


Welfare – Take control of every aspect of their lives. (Food, Housing, Education and Income)


Education – Take control of what people read and listen to, and especially take control of what children learn in school. Teach students WHAT to think, not HOW to think (our educational system coupled with censorship, as we see in all forms of media)


Religion – The tenets of religion are the strongest defense against socialism. Socialism requires removing belief in God from the Government and schools. Deprive religion of any public forum, which cripples its ability to sustain itself


Class Warfare – Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor, and by race, gender and by any other criterion possible. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.

It is all about CONTROLLING the people. Make them dependent upon welfare, drugs, and even deprive them of their basic needs and have the government provide them, and as long as you have disarmed them and robbed them of the courage that comes from a faith in God, you will have all the power, unencumbered, and an unending supply of serfs. And the global cabal that caused this crisis will attempt to fulfill their dream of that New World Order by first creating the crisis (Covid-19), then provide a deadly solution via a vaccine with nanotechnology that will, at the appropriate time, be "triggered" with the new, higher frequency 5G network that China was thoughtful enough to build (a module in the electronics of the 5G towers has "COV-19" emblazoned on it - THAT is what will be activated when the time is right. 

Mark my words - the coming vaccine will be a weapon to depopulate even more than Covid. And those that survive the injection will be controlled by way of 5G, which will be discovered to cause harm to the body, the immune system and even our DNA. They have the technology. They have the patents as I detailed in previous blog posts. And they certainly have the desire to depopulate the planet to a number they can control.

Now, stop and ask yourself - which political party is pushing for all of the above? And is that a world you would be comfortable living in?

The 2020 election will be the the most critical election since Abraham Lincoln, maybe more so. Choose the world you want to live in, or have it chosen for you

 

 (Brought to you by IntelliBiz)