Proof That the Media IS the Enemy of the People

 

Back in the 40's & 50's there was a cartoon on Saturday mornings. It featured a dog, a cat and a parrot. And like most cartoons, it was designed to teach children an important message.

It went like this:

The parrot is not happy that the dog and cat get along so well. He was reading a copy of "Mein Kampf", by Adolf Hitler which gave him an idea. He flies down from his lofty perch to the dog sleeping near the fireplace. He wakes the dog and whispers in his ear and points to the cat, resting peaceably in the easy chair. He tells the dog that the cat is planning to attack him in his sleep, and claw him up. He then flies over to the cat and, pointing to the dog, whispers in the feline's ear that the dog is planning to attack him in his sleep and chew him up.

The parrot  returns to his perch, above the coming fray.

Now eyeing each other with suspicion, the dog and cat become wary of each other, and it only took an accident - a spark from the fireplace - to get the dog to smack the cat, thinking it was responsible. Naturally, the cat fought back and a real, full-blown battle began as they tore each other to shreds.

 But in the fray, they bumped into the parrot's perch, and the book fell to the floor. Upon reading the title they realized they had become victims of the parrot's propaganda, and they began beating the crap out of the parrot.

In America the media was unhappy that people were getting along fairly well lately, which results in "slow news days", resulting in loss of revenue for the media, which makes money and gains its power from controversy and chaos ("dirty laundry"). With the help of some powerful, influential politicians on the left who support socialism and were using a "divide and conquer" regimen to consolidate power, the media began a narrative designed to pit people against one another. Black vs white; rich vs poor; women vs men - the list goes on. The purpose for the media, of course, was to create the hate and chaos they needed for selling their news - subscriptions and ratings - which, in turn, rakes in advertising revenue.

In short, the media is the parrot. We are the dogs and cats. And the push for socialism is the book, Mein Kampf, only today it is the Cloward-Piven model for instilling socialism, which in turn is based on Saul Alinsky's "Rules for Radicals" which, in turn, is founded in the Communist Manifesto.

For those unfamiliar with the Cloward-Piven strategy, this is a summary:

The following "rules" were put forth by Cloward and Piven in 1966, both professors at the Columbia University School of Social Work -

 
Creating a social state involves taking control in eight areas. The first is the most important because it involves everyone and is a matter of life and death. As you read through these (and hopefully think about them), ask yourself who is pushing these:


Healthcare– Control healthcare and you control the people. (Ring a bell?)


Poverty – Increase the poverty level as high as possible, then provide the basics for them from the government teat, because it is easier to control poor people - they won't bite the hand that feeds them. (ring another bell?)


Debt – Literally bankrupt the treasury.  Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty. (A cacaphony of bells)


Gun Control – Remove the ability of the people to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state (Bells, bells, bells)


Welfare – Take control of every aspect of their lives. (Food, Housing, Education and Income)


Education – Take control of what people read and listen to, and especially take control of what children learn in school. Teach students WHAT to think, not HOW to think (our educational system coupled with censorship, as we see in all forms of media)


Religion – The tenets of religion are the strongest defense against socialism. Socialism requires removing belief in God from the Government and schools. Deprive religion of any public forum, which cripples its ability to sustain itself


Class Warfare – Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor, and by race, gender and by any other criterion possible. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.

It is all about CONTROLLING the people. Make them dependent upon welfare, drugs, and even deprive them of their basic needs and have the government provide them, and as long as you have disarmed them and robbed them of the courage that comes from a faith in God, you will have all the power, unencumbered, and an unending supply of serfs. And the global cabal that caused this crisis will attempt to fulfill their dream of that New World Order by first creating the crisis (Covid-19), then provide a deadly solution via a vaccine with nanotechnology that will, at the appropriate time, be "triggered" with the new, higher frequency 5G network that China was thoughtful enough to build (a module in the electronics of the 5G towers has "COV-19" emblazoned on it - THAT is what will be activated when the time is right. 

Mark my words - the coming vaccine will be a weapon to depopulate even more than Covid. And those that survive the injection will be controlled by way of 5G, which will be discovered to cause harm to the body, the immune system and even our DNA. They have the technology. They have the patents as I detailed in previous blog posts. And they certainly have the desire to depopulate the planet to a number they can control.

Now, stop and ask yourself - which political party is pushing for all of the above? And is that a world you would be comfortable living in?

The 2020 election will be the the most critical election since Abraham Lincoln, maybe more so. Choose the world you want to live in, or have it chosen for you

 

 (Brought to you by IntelliBiz)

 

 

A Constitutional Defense Against A COVID-19 Mandatory Vaccine

 

     

by Bill Vaughn

With several governors in America (and perhaps some in the federal government) discussing and/or threatening a mandatory vaccination of all citizens for COVID-19, know that there is a legal defense against it. I am not talking about the Nuremberg Code, although the baisis for that is the same as what is presented here.

American citizens have the protection of the Constitution which points out several natural human rights - rights that come from God, or at least nature. These rights are immutable. As so aptly stated in the Declaration of Independence, we have the right to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."

Every citizen has an immutable right to choose their own fate. SCOTUS has struck down vagrancy laws for that reason - no person is REQUIRED to live by the standard set by another. In other words, we DO have the right to choose what we will do with our own lives. It is the "pursuit of happiness".

By the same token, we each have a right to choose what risk(s) we will or will not accept. If a person chooses to be a soldier or law enforcement officer and risks his or her life, he/she has the right to make that choice. Evel Knievel risked his life all the time. He had that right.

The same is true of a vaccine - we have the right to choose the risk of getting the vaccine (and there are several), or the risk involved in not getting it. And while there are those that will use the argument that a mandated vaccine is for the public good, to protect one another, that argument is bogus simply because the unvaccinated do not place the vaccinated at risk. The only person(s) an unvaccinated person places at risk are other persons who also made that same choice, knowing the risk and accepting that risk which they have a right to do under common law - their personal sovereignty. If I am not vaccinated, I am fully aware that I can become infected by another unvaccinated person that may be infected, and I chose to accept that risk.

Anyone unwilling to accept the risk of COVID-19, for example, would be free to get a vaccine when available. Those of us who choose not to are no threat to those who are vaccinated, so the "public good" argument does not fly.

Of course, in 1905 SCOTUS ruled that a vaccine could be made mandatory, but there are issues with that ruling. The first issue, of course, is the Constitution and our God-given rights. And while the court determined the "public safety" allowed them to over-rule the Constitution, that, itself was unConstitutional, primarily for the reason given above - the "public safety" issue is bogus in the case of vaccines, because an unvaccinated person poses no threat to anyone except others who knowingly accepted the same risks.

But there are other issues with the 1905 ruling:

• In 1905 there was a lot that was not known about vaccines. Today we know they can kill people. Bill gates has stated it will likely kill at least 700,000. We also  know they affect our immune system. And in the case of an RNA/DNA vaccine (which is the one being tested), it could change the entire human genome, and maybe not for the better
• In 1905, there were no studies that linked vaccinations to other possible medical conditions. As new studies come to light, it appears vaccines can do great harm to a person's health
• A COVID-19 vaccine is untested as far as long-term side effects, because the vaccine was rushed. NO ONE knows what the ultimate effect would be, or if it is truly "safe"
• In 1905, "tracking chips" and nanotechnology did not exist. If included in a vaccine, no matter the reason, a person has every right to reject it. And since there currently is no way to tell if it is or is not included, individuals have the right to reject any and all vaccines in the future.
• The 1905 decision also stated that a vaccine could only be mandated if there were no alternative therapies. Regardless of what many with ulterior motives claim, there are alternatives, not the least of which is Ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine with Z-pak, zinc, and vitamin C & D3. There is also Remdevisir and possibly infusion of antibodies (plasma)

None of this, however, will make much difference if the State decides to violate our rights against our will. They do it all the time. Wearing or not wearing seat belts and helmets is a personal choice as to the level of risk we will take, and Constitutionally, we should be the ones making those choices for ourselves. If I get in a motorcycle accident while not wearing a helmet, only my life is at risk, and as long as I am properly insured, any cost involved is covered, which protects taxpayers from picking up the tab. Yet, many states force us to wear them. Thankfully, more and more states have deemed helmet laws unconstitutional for adults. They should do the same with seat belts.

Perhaps the most important defense (as of this writing is obvious, but not yet proved) is that the "Covid vaccines" contain graphene oxide, the greatest conductor on the planet, used in AI. It has been proved that certain frequencies can animate it and get it to build structures. And while it cannot breach the blood brain barrier on its own, it can enter the brain if the barrier is punctured by, say, a LONG swap shoved deep into the nasal cavity. Now consider that the required frequency is 5G. It is no longer a stretch to assume that graphene oxide in the brain can build the neural link that Elon Musk speaks of which would connect people to "the internet of things". And once the person is connected directly to the internet, everything they think, do and say, every place they go, everyone they speak with, all of their medical history, their "digital ID complete with financial data and even their vital signs can be controlled by whoever runs the 5G and the servers. The person can, just like a computer or smart phone, can simply be shut off as desired.

In the event any government entity decides to mandate a vaccine, it will most assuredly end up at the Supreme Court, and hopefully the court will favor the Constitution this time. But if it does not, there is still an alternative - we can once again fight for our human rights as we did in 1776...

/

The Push For A Cashless Society - and Why We Must Stop It

 

Globalists are intent on creating a New World Order that requires a cashless society. And the push has begun. The purpose?  Ultimate control. If we are unable to make transactions without using a privately owned gateway (card, chip or vaccine tracking), this is anything but smart. In a cashless society, We, the People would have NO wealth, or means by which we could buy, sell or trade but what it is controlled by the globalist financial institutions - herein called the Masters. You will only have that which the "Masters" permit you to have.

For example, the nanotech option that can be introduced into your body with some mandatory vaccine (see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ywuCRVJVDqs  for how this would work)** would be accessible to the Masters. Your "income", or allotment would be electronically inputted. It's in your blood! When you go to buy something, the merchant would electronically "read" you, as they now read cards, and the amount for your purchase would be withdrawn. 

 

 **UPDATE: YouTube, of course, took down that video. Their Globalist masters do not want people to know these things.

 

(NOTE: Luciferase is actually the name they have given to the vaccine component that delivers the digital info. Think about that! LUCIFER. They are not even hiding it. The hydrogel in the vaccine - AI nanotechnology - would contain all your information - everything you do, say, anywhere you go, who you meet, your health, emotions - everything). Who collects that info? What would they do with it? Answer - anything they want. If you fail to live according to their narrative and follow their orders, you can be disconnected from the entire conomy with the push of a button. You die.

This is dangerous. You may want to believe this is “for your own Safety” but . . . A cashless society means no cash. . Zero . . . It doesn’t mean mostly cashless and you can still use a ‘wee bit of cash here & there’.  Cashless means fully digital, fully traceable, fully controlled. I think those who support a cashless society aren’t fully aware of what they are asking for. The Masters know - but not the people.

 

While they may sell you on the idea by convincing you of the sheer "convenience", consider:

• You would have a difficult, if not impossible task of knowing what you have left of your allotment
• What happens to the "wealth" stored in your blood when you die? Can it somehow be transferred to your heirs?
• What happens if there is a "glitch" in the system used by merchants or the financial institutions?
• What if, for strictly political or any other reason the Masters decide you are using up more valuable resources than they deem you to be worth? Could they just shut you off, leaving you unable to buy, sell or trade anything, and you starve? Remember - Globalists have gone on record as supporters of eugenics - eliminating undesirables.
  

 

A cashless society means:

• You could only buy items they approve - what if they DISAPPROVE buying guns & ammo, which they surely must
  
• No more tuck-away cash for those preparing to leave domestic violence.
• No more purchases off marketplace unless you want to risk bank transfer fraud.
• No more garage sales.
• No more cash donations to hungry homeless you pass.
• No more cash slipped into the hands of a child from their grandparent.
• No more money in birthday cards.
• No more piggy banks or tooth fairy for your child.
• No more selling bits & pieces from your home that you no longer want/need for a bit of cash in return.
• Less choices of where you purchase based on affordability.
• Restricted ability to support certain "unapproved" charities or churches

What a cashless society does guarantee:

• Banks have full control of every single penny you "own".
• Every transaction you make is recorded.
• All your movements & actions are traceable.
• Access to your money can be blocked at the click of a button when/if banks need ‘clarification’ from you which could take weeks, a hundred questions answered & five hundred passwords.
• If your transactions are deemed in any way questionable, by those who create the questions, your money will be frozen, ‘for your own good’. [UPDATE 02/05/2022: Wells Fargo just froze millions of Wendy William's money "for her own good"]
  
•  And if you have ever held a religious belief, never, ever forget the prophecy in Revelations - that only by having the "mark of the beast", in your hand or forehead will you be permitted to buy, sell, trade. And ANY person who has the mark will NOT survive the apocalypse, and shall be cast into Hell for having sold their soul to Lucifer.
  

And before anybody slams this post ... don’t go shooting the messenger ...I’m sharing it because maybe we all need to take off our blinders for a second. 

Forget about cash being dirty. Cash has been around for a very, very long time & it gives you control over how you trade with the world. It gives you independence.
 

WHAT TO DO:

If you are a customer, pay with cash. If you are a shop owner, remove those ridiculous signs that ask people to pay by card.  Cash is a legal tender, it is our right to pay with cash.  But banks are making it increasingly difficult to use cash & that has nothing to do with a virus.

Stop believing everything you hear on the TV. Almost every single topic in today’s world is tainted with corruption & hidden agendas. Politics & greed is what is wrong with the world; not those who are trying to alert you to the reality.

Please pay with cash & please say no to a cashless society while you still have a choice. Contact your Representatives & Senators and ask them to make law that PROTECTS the UNFETTERED use of cash, permanently.
 

Please Share! Pass this on to EVERYONE you know, or we WILL all suffer the consequences

 

(brought to you by IntelliBiz)

 

/

REAL ESTATE - Huge Profits In The Age of COVID & Civil Unrest

Did you know that massive profits in real estate abound in times of mass migration, as we are now experiencing as people flee the unrest and violence in metro areas, seeking refuge for their families in suburban and rural portions of the country?

There is a tremendous amount of uncertainty these days, particularly in respect to COVID-19 and the recent civil unrest and violence in some cities. However, there is one thing we can be certain of - because of COVID-19 and the current state of affairs, the opportunity to make huge profits in real estate, quickly and easily, is very real indeed.

We know real estate investing is most profitable in a period of mass migration as we are now experiencing as people flee simply because everyone needs a place to live. People in transition need new homes to move to. Whether you live in a metro area experiencing violence & unrest and need to get out, or you live in the suburbs or rural area, or you are simply looking to get a great deal on a new home, there is now great potential to make huge profits even if you do not have cash or credit to work with. As people flee the cities en masse to escape civil unrest and draconian lockdown measures, they need housing elsewhere, and the "elsewhere" is the suburbs and rural areas. Thanks to "supply & demand", the price of housing in those areas is skyrocketing. If you know the tricks of the trade (see below), you can take advantage of the profits from that migration.

Even in urban metro areas there is huge potential to profit. As cities empty, the prime, expensive property in those areas drop in value precipitously. An investor who knows how to take advantage is in a postion to pick up massive bargains, as prime properties once worth a fortune become bargains. Why would you want to control (not necessarily own) such properties? Because they will very quickly regain their value once things settle down. By learning how to take over control of a property from desperate sellers, even without buying them, you will be able to cash in when things turn around. Control of property is just as good as owning it.

If you think you need deep pockets and great credit, think again. Neither is necessary. Of the 22 different, legitimate methods taught in "The Simple Man's Guide to Real Estate", 8 of those methods do not require you to put up cash or credit.

But here's the catch - this real estate surge will only last a little while, perhaps 18-24 months. If you do not act now, you will miss it.

Do yourself and your loved ones a favor and at least check it out. It costs nothing to look!

/

The Documentary You MUST watch (gateway)

 

 

 This will be short...

Twitter and other social media have banned people from posting any link to the "Out of Shadows" documentary because it awakens people to what is REALLY going on, and that social media is involved in covering it up because they appear to be a cog in the globalist world of evil.

So I have taken this step - by posting the link here, you can come from Twitter or FB and see the video for yourself.

ATTENTION: While it is hoped you will spread a link to THIS page so others can access the video, please - be sneaky about it. Otherwise, Twitter and the rest will discover, and ban, this page, too.

THE TRUTH MUST GET OUT!

https://www.outofshadows.org/ Out of Shadows

The (Strong) Case Against Forced Vaccinations, Masks & Lockdowns

 

This is not a dissertation on whether or not vaccinations, masks or lockdowns are good or bad. It is simply about whether or not people should be forced to cede their God-given human rights to any authoritarians that believe they know what is best for us, and wishes to impose his or her will on others, regardless of the reason.

Dictators dictate.They are tyrants. In America, tyranny is not permitted. And tyrants will always find an excuse for their authoritarianism. Today, that excuse is Covid-19, whether it is mask mandates, or forced vaccination, or contact tracing. And there is no doubt that any "leader" who leads by force is not governing - he or she is not leading at all. They are RULING, by force and decree. And that is also in violation of the Constitution and even our basic rights as humans. America was founded on the first principle of self-rule, and our elected leaders are chosen to serve the people, not rule over them. The people, not the leaders, are supreme according to the Constitution, and our rights do not become mere privileges by a decree of elected officials or their un-elected appointees. Nothing changes that - not war (interment of Japanese in WWII "for the public safety" was illegal), not natural disaster (it was illegal during hurricane Katrina for leaders to confiscate guns "for public safety") or disease (it would be illegal to mandate masks or vaccines) even under the pretext of  the "public safety".

Uninformed people might use the reasoning that no person has a right to endanger the lives of others, which may be true to an extent. Yet, that is done every time a person imbibes in alcohol, or gets behind the wheel. We put others peoples' lives in jeopardy every day, and we all accept those risks. But more to the point...

A person who does not wear a mask (which studies have repeatedly shown are useless in controlling spread of a virus) is not endangering anyone if he or she is not infected. The uninfected cannot spread anything. And even if he/she becomes infected, if the infection is known, THAT person must be quarantined until the infection is gone, but if the infection is not known (asymptomatic), studies have shown and the CDC concurs that asymptomatic people cannot spread a virus. And even if they could,  he or she can only infect others who have CHOSEN to take the same risk and not wear a mask. That is THEIR choice to make. Each of us has a right to choose the risks we are willing to accept, whether it is the risk of a dangerous vocation (i.e. soldier, telephone lineman), or the risk of infection by not wearing a mask. Even if EVERY PERSON who chooses not to wear a mask (or get a vaccine) were to become infected and even die, that is STILL THEIR CHOICE! Our bodies, our choice. Such people pose zero threat to anyone else but those other independent people making that same choice. If a person can choose to be a soldier and risk death, or drive a car and risk other peoples' lives as well as his own, then that same person has the right to not wear a mask or accept a vaccine.

If I do not get the vaccine, I am no threat to those who have been vaccinated. And while I could pose a threat to other non-vaccinated people, they, like myself, CHOSE that risk, which is the God given right of every human. If they are unwilling to accept that risk, they can simply get vaccinated.

The same is true with lockdowns, which, by the way, have been proven to exacerbate the pandemic. But that is not the issue. The issue is this - those who CHOOSE to "play it safe" are perfectly free to stay home. Those who accept the risks of being out and about, enjoying life, are entitled to THEIR choice, since it threatens no one who chooses to stay home. In the end, the revelers enjoying life may or may not take losses (their choice) but will end up with herd immunity, and able to enjoy life to it's fullest. But those who locked down must eventually come out - and they will NOT have herd immunity. The virus will still be there, waiting for them. They gave up their freedoms and  destroyed their lives for naught.

Officials in Sweden knew this, and they are doing fine. But in every country that utilized lockdowns, and mandated the wearing of masks are suffering a new bout of the virus, because the virus is STILL THERE, and those countries did not allow herd immunity to build.

As for a vaccine - even Bill Gates admitted a Covid-19 vaccine could kill 700,000 people. That's nearly as bad as the virus itself! And it is likely to only be 40% effective, like other flu vaccines. And it will not protect for life, as herd immunity would - the vaccine must be taken each year.

On a side note: vaccines work by suppressing the immune system, which sets the stage for other diseases to wrack the body later. The REASON the virus kills people is because our immune systems are already compromised by countless other vaccines,  poor nutrition, underlying conditions and age. That is precisely why it kills mostly the elderly and those with underlying conditions. And studies indicate that many of those underlying conditions were caused by immune systems already weakened, often by previous vaccines.

As for masks - the REAL scientific studies - even the ones originally promoted by the CDC and W.H.O. - have shown time and again that masks simply do not work, and can even make things worse. You can find all those legitimate studies online. Or, you can simply believe the misinformation being put out there by the mainstream media which is fed to them by the very people who have a financial stake in vaccines (Fauci & Gates, by the way, are heavily invested in ALL of the vaccines being created).

And that - money - is the very reason the FDA (funded primarily by Big Pharma), mainstream media and so many of the "experts" are trying to push Hydroxychloroquine off the table. If it is proven effective, they will ALL lose billions.

And here is the reason they will have no legal authority to mandate vaccines - in 1905 the Supreme Court determined that vaccines could be mandated, BUT ONLY IF THERE WERE NO OTHER OPTIONS, and ONLY if there were a real crisis. There are other therapeutic options for Covid (HCQ), AND it is no longer a crisis. More importantly, in 1905 they believed things about vaccines that we now know are not true; that they can be very dangerous and harmful, and efficacy is low.

That's it, folks. But be forewarned - many elected officials, doing the bidding of those with a financial interest, WILL try to mandate masks (to make you more willing to get the vaccine so you can go back to normal) and WILL try to implement forced vaccinations, and the subsequent tracking that will lead to a New World Order, where freedoms and individuality will not - cannot - be tolerated.

Whether or not they succeed depends on YOU. Only we, the People have the power to stop them. But the real question is - do we have the will to fight for our lives, our freedom, our country?

 

(Brought to you by IntelliBiz)

/

Presidential Racism in America

For those of you who may not be up to speed on the latest claim by Joe Biden that Donald Trump is "the first racist president", I determined that needed to be fact-checked, considering the upcoming election. I need proof before I accept something blindly, and you should, as well. Time to do in-depth research.

It was immediately apparent that several American presidents were racist. Early presidents were known to be slave holders, and it simply is not possible to own slaves and not consider them as inferior, which is the classic definition of racism.

Woodrow Wilson watched the KKK propaganda flick in the Oval Office, fired all black personnel and avoided confirming any black person. He also made racist remarks and re-instituted segregation. Franklin Delano Roosevelt literally imprisoned all Japanese-American citizens in internment camps during World War II. And Lyndon Baines Johnson wasn't exactly "inclusive".

The facts show that a number of presidents were racist.

So it is a fact that Donald John Trump is not the FIRST racist president. So then the question becomes - why does Joe Biden and many other people insist on calling Donald Trump a racist? What is the evidence?

In doing research (which most people do not bother doing), I found some very interesting facts. I found that Trump dated a black woman, hired black people, and even hired a black woman to a very high position in the Trump Empire. But those things did not necessarily prove he was not racist. So, I dug deeper.

In the 1990's, Trump sued Palm Beach FL to allow Mar-a-Lago to allow blacks and Jews to become members - something no other golf resorts in the area would do and Palm Beach would not permit. Not only did he win, but the win pressured others to follow suit and now all those clubs are open to blacks and Jews.

As I continued to dig into Trump's past, I ran across a video that featured Judge Joe Brown - a black judge who gained fame with his own TV series. A very well respected individual of high moral character, Judge brown recalled in the interview that back in the 1990's, black entrepreneurs were having trouble getting loans to start their businesses. Judge Brown sent them to Donald Trump. Trump gave them the money they needed on the stipulation they would repay the entire note, with interest, in one payment. As the loans came due, those black entrepreneurs went to repay Trump. In each case he simply tore up their checks and simply told them to go and run their business. That video interview with Judge Brown can be seen here...https://twitter.com/i/status/1273320616326815745

Collectively, or even individually these things appear to paint a picture of a person who is anything but racist. So why do so many people insist he is racist?

It seems that, for strictly political purposes, the mainstream media labeled him "racist" because of certain things Trump did, or said, that they could color as racist, even though they could have been said or done for completely different reasons. For example, when he campaigned and said a lot of Mexicans coming here illegally were criminals. Anyone not knowing Trump could take that as racist, even though it was simply a factual statement with no racist intent. But the media pounced on it and convinced many who did not know Trump that he was a racist.

And then there were the travel bans. Although Trump stated clearly the bans were for security reasons (the countries he was banning were the countries most apt to harbor terrorists), again the media - and others with a political agenda - pointed at him and called him "racist". And more uninformed people bought into it because they wanted to believe it - after all, the vast majority of them were Hillary supporters.

And then, in January 2020 when the Corona Virus from China began infecting the world, Trump banned travel from China. Fueled by the media, Biden and other Democrats called him xenophobic and racist, despite the fact that the ban was strictly to protect America from the virus, to buy us more time. The media and others on the left chose to overlook the fact that Trump acted decisively in January while the Democrats were focused only on impeaching him, and Democrats like Pelosi, Schumer and DiBlasio were still encouraging people to "mingle and party it up", as late as April.

The left also conveniently ignores that it was Trump who initiated "Opportunity Zones" to lift up minority communities. He is the one who instituted criminal justice and prison reform and the First Step Act, to undo the racist laws put forth and supported by Clinton & Biden in the 90's. And he permanently funded HBCU's (black colleges & universities).

None of the things Trump said or did constitutes any racist act, though it could be assumed as such by people wanting to believe it, ignoring all his actions throughout his life that indicated he was anything but racist.

But don't take my word for it - do the research for yourself! Listen to the many minority individuals that Trump has interacted with, and helped, throughout his life. Listen to Judge Joe Brown, and hundreds of other persons of color who actually know him.

You can, of course, continue to believe Donald John Trump is a racist, if that is what suits your agenda. But if you are going to be honest, and if you have integrity, you would have to admit that he is not the racist that the media and Democrat politicians paint him to be, simply because they want to beat him at the polls.

/