"Work Spouses"

This really takes the cake. And it is not a joke - this is real.

It seems that certain elitist liberals have come up with a new term for adultery that makes it acceptable in their eyes. Called "work spouses", the concept is simple: a person who spends a lot of time working and away from his or her spouse each day is entitled to build a relationship with another "spouse" at work, so he or she need not be without a love object close by. This makes him or her a more fulfilled and happier person. DUH!

The liberals seem to think that the mere fact that they have renamed adultery makes it all better - it is not really adultery because it is not called adultery. Furthermore, it is perfectly acceptable because each is a "legitimate" spouse, albeit serving separate functions - to assuage the ego and remove guilt.

Let's be clear here. It is an established fact that liberals seek to remove any stigma, any guilt, from any action. They do not want to be forced to take responsibility for anything unpleasant. It is liberals who created "political correctness", and the new language that does not permit us to call a spade a spade. A fat person is "weight challenged". Bull! Does anyone really think that a fat person does not know you are calling them fat when you say they are weight challenged? Of course they do! So the only purpose of political correctness is to allow liberals to get a guilt-free ride. They don't have to feel bad about calling anyone fat, because they did not use that particular word.

What crap.

Illegal immigrants are "undocumented workers", even though many are not workers at all, but gang members. Cripples became disabled, and when that word got so overused as to mean "cripple", the liberals changed it to "physically challenged." Once that term gets to mean cripple, I wonder what pretty phrase they will choose next.

Now, cheating on your spouse with your secretary, which is a bad thing, is now simply a case of having a "work spouse", which they deem acceptable. Why not just become a Mormon fundamentalist and be done with it?

You cannot call a homosexual a homosexual - they are now "gay", and that makes it more acceptable because it does not straight out say that it is man-on-man, as the word homosexual does.

Your garbage man is a "sanitation engineer". However, I do not know of anything that a garbage man does that involves engineering, other than engineering a way to keep his pants above his butt-crack.

The liberal agenda is public knowledge - abortion on demand, euthanasia, legalize drugs, legalize prostitution, legalize all gambling, gay marriage, remove religion from public view or discourse, tear up the Constitution in favor of a "one world" view, making us all subject to what the rest of the world decides.

In short, "if it feels good, do it, and feel no guilt over it. If it is a bad thing, we'll cover it up, or rename it."

But why this particular push for making "work spouses" acceptable? Two things: one is the obvious - they want to cheat, free of guilt. But there is a more ominous purpose. Liberals want an "open, anything goes" society. To that end, they are pushing gay marriage - not because they love gays so much, but because they want to destroy the confines of the term "marriage". If marriage is opened to gays, it is a short step to opening it for multiple spouses, or even under age spouses (which liberals also support actively - they support the Man-Boy Love Association, and liberal judges set child molesters free).

The ideal "anything goes" world that liberals seek cannot become reality if morality stands in the way. Marriage. Fidelity. Honesty. Integrity. Respect. Civility. Shunning temptation. The 10 Commandments. Such things must be destroyed, completely. In fact, anything that provides any sense of guilt whatever must be removed.

"Anything Goes!" I believe that was the motto of Sodom & Gomorrah.

/