It is surprising how few people understand the trickery and deceit practiced by one political party. People would do well to pay attention to the tale of Pindarovia, which I wrote and posted several years ago.
The people of the kingdom of Pindarovia were strong and independent. So much so that the tryannical king needed to find a way to weaken them enough so he could keep them under his complete control. He knew the best way to do that would be to first weaken them, then make them dependent upon him for their very lives.
The king went to his wizard to find a way to accomplish the task. The wizard gave the king a potion that, when ingested, would weaken even the strongest of men.
The king, being a wiley man, knew his people would not willingly drink of the foul potion. So he had his cooks make a recipe to make the potion appealing. They added sugar, blueberries and served it up with ice cream on the side.
When one wise man stood and tried to warn the people that this would be bad for them, the king merely said, "Why would you want to keep the people from having blueberries? Why would you want to deprive them of ice cream? How can you be so cruel and wrong-headed?"
And the people, wanting the ice cream and blueberries, were fooled into taking the potion. And they were weakened, and became dependent upon the king for their survival.
Now, you might think this is only a cute little story. But it is much more than that. This sort of thing goes on all the time. Remember all those people who drank the poison believing it to be Kool-Aid at Jonestown?
And then the "Affordable health care" bill. The liberals added a few good things, like covering children with pre-existing conditions, and used those things to "sweeten" the poison that is in the bill. And when a conservative steps up and says this is a bad bill, the liberals say, "Why would you be against covering kids with pre-existing conditions? What kind of monster are you?"
The truth is, conservatives are not against the blueberries or the ice cream. They are against the poison that is being delivered with it.
And when liberals try to accuse conservatives of not caring about the people, they are blatantly lying. They know that is not true, but they use that to con the people into thinking that conservatives are bad.
So here is the difference - liberals give you blueberries and ice cream to get you to eat the poison. Conservatives want you to have the blueberries and ice cream, but without the poison. Democrat politicians ALWAYS insert a "poison pill" into every piece of legislation they propose, because that makes it impossible for them to lose - if the legislation passes, their poison becomes law (like the taxes & penalties in ObamaCare), and if the legislation fails, they get to beat up the Republicans for denying the people the "blueberries and ice cream". I repeat - EVERY piece of Democrat legislation includes a poison pill.
Whenever you hear Democrats claim that Republicans are mean, cruel, hate women, hate children, want dirty water and air etc., it is because they inserted poison into an otherwise beneficial bill, and the Republicans shot down the bill because of the poison pill. Think about that the next time you hear Democrats make such claims, and take the time to look for the "poison pill" in their bill.
And the sooner people stop being fooled by the wiley king and begin listening to the truth, the better off we will all be.
/
Monday, November 13, 2017
Friday, October 20, 2017
Why Liberals Are Rewriting History
From an article posted by Stormfront.org over 25 years ago:
"WHEN THE COMMUNISTS TOOK OVER a country, one of the first things that they did was to confiscate all the privately-held weapons, to deny the people the physical ability to resist tyranny. But even more insidious than the theft of the people's weapons was the theft of their history (italics are mine). Official Communist "historians" rewrote history to fit the current party line. In many countries, revered national heroes were excised from the history books, or their real deeds were distorted to fit Communist ideology, and Communist killers and criminals were converted into official "saints." Holidays were declared in honor of the beasts who murdered countless nations."
Fast forward 25 years and here we are, with radical liberals attempting to ban our guns, destroy statues of historically important figures, and rewriting history to reflect a new reality that has little basis in fact. Washington and Lincoln once had holidays in their honor. Now all we have is a generic "President's Day". We were told by liberals that holidays which honor individuals instead of accomplishments are wrong. But then those same liberals pushed for - and got - a special holiday honoring an individual - Martin Luther King Jr. - and vociferously opposed naming the day for the accomplishment (Civil Rights Day) instead of the individual.
And let us not overlook the current disrespect to our flag and National Anthem being pushed by the radical liberals of Black Lives Matter, another radical group funded by the billionaire socialist, George Soros.
And those same liberals who scream that Washington, Jefferson and Columbus were bad people, they idolize the likes of Che Guevera, Mao, Stalin & Lenin, Castro - all of whom were responsible for the mass murder of millions. "Communist killers and criminals being converted into saints."
Look at what the George Soros funded groups of liberal activists are doing in America today, then re-read that excerpt above, published a quarter century ago.
Now tell me these radical liberals, called "Progressives", are not Hell-bent on destroying our Republic
/
"WHEN THE COMMUNISTS TOOK OVER a country, one of the first things that they did was to confiscate all the privately-held weapons, to deny the people the physical ability to resist tyranny. But even more insidious than the theft of the people's weapons was the theft of their history (italics are mine). Official Communist "historians" rewrote history to fit the current party line. In many countries, revered national heroes were excised from the history books, or their real deeds were distorted to fit Communist ideology, and Communist killers and criminals were converted into official "saints." Holidays were declared in honor of the beasts who murdered countless nations."
Fast forward 25 years and here we are, with radical liberals attempting to ban our guns, destroy statues of historically important figures, and rewriting history to reflect a new reality that has little basis in fact. Washington and Lincoln once had holidays in their honor. Now all we have is a generic "President's Day". We were told by liberals that holidays which honor individuals instead of accomplishments are wrong. But then those same liberals pushed for - and got - a special holiday honoring an individual - Martin Luther King Jr. - and vociferously opposed naming the day for the accomplishment (Civil Rights Day) instead of the individual.
And let us not overlook the current disrespect to our flag and National Anthem being pushed by the radical liberals of Black Lives Matter, another radical group funded by the billionaire socialist, George Soros.
And those same liberals who scream that Washington, Jefferson and Columbus were bad people, they idolize the likes of Che Guevera, Mao, Stalin & Lenin, Castro - all of whom were responsible for the mass murder of millions. "Communist killers and criminals being converted into saints."
Look at what the George Soros funded groups of liberal activists are doing in America today, then re-read that excerpt above, published a quarter century ago.
Now tell me these radical liberals, called "Progressives", are not Hell-bent on destroying our Republic
/
Saturday, September 23, 2017
"Take A Knee" - It May Not Be A RIGHT
People on the left are under the mistaken impression that the rights we have as citizens are absolute. They are not. When an NFL player "takes a knee" to diss America, they try to claim they have a Constitutional right to do so, but that is not exactly true.
When you are on your own time, you absolutely have a right to take a knee. But when you are accepting pay from someone to work on their behalf, you do not have the right to take a knee - the only right you have while you are on someone else's dime is what your boss says you have. If the boss says you may take a knee, then he has given you the PRIVILEGE to do so, not the RIGHT to do so. And if the boss says you may not take a knee, then you have neither the right nor the privilege at that time.
When you are "on the clock", your boss has every right to suspend your rights while you are on his time. You have a right to bear arms - but NOT in the workplace if your employer says "no guns on the premises." You have a right to privacy - but not in the workplace if your employer wants to monitor you. You have a right to worship, but not on company time. You have a right to express your personal beliefs - but not when your employer says "not on my time", as your speech/actions can reflect adversely on him.
As a private citizen, you have rights. As an employee, your employer can suspend many of your rights if those rights could reflect adversely on the employer.
So, NFL players do have a right to "take a knee" on their own time, but they do not have that right to do it on the field. Their employer may, at his or her discretion, allow them the privilege, but it is not a right. If the boss says you may not do something, but you do it anyway, your boss has every right to fire you.
Period.
When you are on your own time, you absolutely have a right to take a knee. But when you are accepting pay from someone to work on their behalf, you do not have the right to take a knee - the only right you have while you are on someone else's dime is what your boss says you have. If the boss says you may take a knee, then he has given you the PRIVILEGE to do so, not the RIGHT to do so. And if the boss says you may not take a knee, then you have neither the right nor the privilege at that time.
When you are "on the clock", your boss has every right to suspend your rights while you are on his time. You have a right to bear arms - but NOT in the workplace if your employer says "no guns on the premises." You have a right to privacy - but not in the workplace if your employer wants to monitor you. You have a right to worship, but not on company time. You have a right to express your personal beliefs - but not when your employer says "not on my time", as your speech/actions can reflect adversely on him.
As a private citizen, you have rights. As an employee, your employer can suspend many of your rights if those rights could reflect adversely on the employer.
So, NFL players do have a right to "take a knee" on their own time, but they do not have that right to do it on the field. Their employer may, at his or her discretion, allow them the privilege, but it is not a right. If the boss says you may not do something, but you do it anyway, your boss has every right to fire you.
Period.
Tuesday, June 6, 2017
Conning the Uninformed
Often we hear people on the left make claims that they have been "proven right" on this or that, or that "statistics show we are right" about something, but what many do not realize is that they are using an old scam to make it look that way.
Let's say there are 10 NFL games left before the Super Bowl. You tell 100,000 sports gamblers that one NFL team will win Monday's game, and tell another 100,00 that the other team will win. For 100,000 people, your "prediction" was correct. Next week, you tell 50,000 of those 100,000 that team "A' will win, and you tell the other 50,000 that team "B" will win. Now, to 50,000 people, you have been correct 2 times out of two.
The next week, you divide those "winners" again, and to 25,000 people you are 3 for 3. You do this again the next week, and again the week after, and so on. By week 10, 195 people will believe you to be a true genius - a seer - having provided them with the winning team 10 times in a row.
Now with the Super Bowl on the horizon, you tell those 195 people that you will tell them who you think will win the Bowl game, but they must pay you $5000 for that info.
No matter who wins, you walk away with almost a million bucks, and nearly 100 people are toasting you, as they made a bundle from your info. And you can now point to 100 people who will swear your predictions are ALWAYS right.
The losers, of course, may be angry, but you never said you could predict the winner - you simply offered to tell them who you thought would win.
People on the left use the same tactic to "prove" their argument. There may be five "studies" that show a certain result, but what they don't show you are the hundred that show a different result. Like global warming - the left shows 180 years of temperature records to prove the Earth is warming - and it is. But what they do not show is that for the 4 billion years previous to that, Earth's average mean temperature has been up to 20 degrees warmer for roughly 80% of the time (see PALEOMAP created by scientists from many fields having collected the data).
Think about that for a moment - the "climate change" crowd is basing their beliefs on 180 years of records - 180 years out of 4 billion! Earth is normally and naturally much warmer than now. And it is climbing back to its natural place. And the climate bunch neglect to mention that during the "warm spells", mankind fared much, much better than during the "cold spells" that nearly caused our extinction. And they also neglect to remind you that if the Earth warms to its natural state, we will not need to burn as much fossil fuel to keep warm in the cold months, or warm up our cars each morning.
Warm is good. Cold is bad.
Don't buy into the hype posed by the left - you will likely be duped.
/
Let's say there are 10 NFL games left before the Super Bowl. You tell 100,000 sports gamblers that one NFL team will win Monday's game, and tell another 100,00 that the other team will win. For 100,000 people, your "prediction" was correct. Next week, you tell 50,000 of those 100,000 that team "A' will win, and you tell the other 50,000 that team "B" will win. Now, to 50,000 people, you have been correct 2 times out of two.
The next week, you divide those "winners" again, and to 25,000 people you are 3 for 3. You do this again the next week, and again the week after, and so on. By week 10, 195 people will believe you to be a true genius - a seer - having provided them with the winning team 10 times in a row.
Now with the Super Bowl on the horizon, you tell those 195 people that you will tell them who you think will win the Bowl game, but they must pay you $5000 for that info.
No matter who wins, you walk away with almost a million bucks, and nearly 100 people are toasting you, as they made a bundle from your info. And you can now point to 100 people who will swear your predictions are ALWAYS right.
The losers, of course, may be angry, but you never said you could predict the winner - you simply offered to tell them who you thought would win.
People on the left use the same tactic to "prove" their argument. There may be five "studies" that show a certain result, but what they don't show you are the hundred that show a different result. Like global warming - the left shows 180 years of temperature records to prove the Earth is warming - and it is. But what they do not show is that for the 4 billion years previous to that, Earth's average mean temperature has been up to 20 degrees warmer for roughly 80% of the time (see PALEOMAP created by scientists from many fields having collected the data).
Think about that for a moment - the "climate change" crowd is basing their beliefs on 180 years of records - 180 years out of 4 billion! Earth is normally and naturally much warmer than now. And it is climbing back to its natural place. And the climate bunch neglect to mention that during the "warm spells", mankind fared much, much better than during the "cold spells" that nearly caused our extinction. And they also neglect to remind you that if the Earth warms to its natural state, we will not need to burn as much fossil fuel to keep warm in the cold months, or warm up our cars each morning.
Warm is good. Cold is bad.
Don't buy into the hype posed by the left - you will likely be duped.
/
Thursday, May 18, 2017
The Swamp Is Winning - Here Is How We Can Fight Back
We, the Deplorables elected a person to the White House for the express purpose of bringing government back into line, to be the servant of We, the People. We wanted someone who would fight for us, against the "powers that be."
But the "swamp" of Washington D.C. is incredibly large, deep, dirty and filled with every manner of despicable creature, all of which want to retain power. And to that end they will tell any lie, do any dirty deed, and be as dishonest as necessary.
These swamp creatures include many of those in Congress, from left-wing liberal Democrats who refuse to relinquish their power, to many establishment Republicans who also refuse to give up their own power, granted to them by the "establishment", not the people.
And these Washington rats are given cover by the liberal mainstream media, protecting the swamp creatures with fake news, dishonest, biased "reporting" and out-right subterfuge.
Too make things worse, there is a "deep state" arm of government that is dedicated to preserving the status quo. These are made up of establishment "public servants" dedicated to serving only themselves, and will torpedo anyone who gets in their way, using illegal leaks, phony stories and any other illicit means necessary.
Yes, the swamp is a powerful thing, and one man - President Donald Trump - is desperately trying to wrestle all the alligators into submission. But here's the fact we, the Deplorables must fully understand - without our help, without "We, the People" fighting back, the president is only one person, and doesn't stand much chance.
You gambled on Trump. You supported him through thick and thin. And now, when he actually needs our help, most of us sit idly by, thinking there is nothing we can do.
WRONG!
Here is what we can, and must, do:
1) Contact your elected Representatives and Senators, and push others to do the same, telling those disingenuous, power-hungry clowns that if they continue to subvert Trump's agenda, or even fail to fully support it, they will lose the power they are fighting to preserve, because they will be voted out of office.
2) Boycott ALL liberal mainstream media where they have replaced honest, unbiased reporting with partisan, political attacks, like pit bulls tearing apart a kitten. Do not buy their newspapers, magazines or watch their television poison. Do not visit their websites. Burn the NYT and Washington Post, and tune out the likes of CNN, ABC and shows like "The View".
3) Stop watching shows or movies featuring celebrities that publicly slander the president, just to get their sorry faces in the news, trying to stay relevant
4) Boycott any major advertiser of those media outlets, no matter who they are. Let the advertisers know that their support of such poison will cost them dearly.
5) Keep informed. Check in with honest reporters, like those on Fox News, or talk radio like Ingraham or Rush, to see who is doing what. When some moronic Senator like John McCain makes a stupid, unfounded assertion like when he said the Trump "scandal" is like Watergate, CONTACT that Senator, or representative, and straighten them out
6) Don't be afraid to be informed, and use that knowledge to spread the word. You would be surprised to learn how few people know there is a video of Comey, under oath before Congress just a few days ago, stating that no one at any time ever attempted to get him to stop any investigation. Yet, the purveyors of fabrication are telling us that there is a Comey "memo" stating Trump tried to tell Comey to stop the investigation, and they call it "obstruction of justice".
Get informed through reliable, honest media. Stay informed. And get out there and actually fight back against the forces of evil that inhabit the murky, stinking swamp. You can start by passing along this post.
And don't forget to vote accordingly.
And remember - the Bible clearly states that the deceivers are the Devils henchmen. It's time to choose sides.
/.
But the "swamp" of Washington D.C. is incredibly large, deep, dirty and filled with every manner of despicable creature, all of which want to retain power. And to that end they will tell any lie, do any dirty deed, and be as dishonest as necessary.
These swamp creatures include many of those in Congress, from left-wing liberal Democrats who refuse to relinquish their power, to many establishment Republicans who also refuse to give up their own power, granted to them by the "establishment", not the people.
And these Washington rats are given cover by the liberal mainstream media, protecting the swamp creatures with fake news, dishonest, biased "reporting" and out-right subterfuge.
Too make things worse, there is a "deep state" arm of government that is dedicated to preserving the status quo. These are made up of establishment "public servants" dedicated to serving only themselves, and will torpedo anyone who gets in their way, using illegal leaks, phony stories and any other illicit means necessary.
Yes, the swamp is a powerful thing, and one man - President Donald Trump - is desperately trying to wrestle all the alligators into submission. But here's the fact we, the Deplorables must fully understand - without our help, without "We, the People" fighting back, the president is only one person, and doesn't stand much chance.
You gambled on Trump. You supported him through thick and thin. And now, when he actually needs our help, most of us sit idly by, thinking there is nothing we can do.
WRONG!
Here is what we can, and must, do:
1) Contact your elected Representatives and Senators, and push others to do the same, telling those disingenuous, power-hungry clowns that if they continue to subvert Trump's agenda, or even fail to fully support it, they will lose the power they are fighting to preserve, because they will be voted out of office.
2) Boycott ALL liberal mainstream media where they have replaced honest, unbiased reporting with partisan, political attacks, like pit bulls tearing apart a kitten. Do not buy their newspapers, magazines or watch their television poison. Do not visit their websites. Burn the NYT and Washington Post, and tune out the likes of CNN, ABC and shows like "The View".
3) Stop watching shows or movies featuring celebrities that publicly slander the president, just to get their sorry faces in the news, trying to stay relevant
4) Boycott any major advertiser of those media outlets, no matter who they are. Let the advertisers know that their support of such poison will cost them dearly.
5) Keep informed. Check in with honest reporters, like those on Fox News, or talk radio like Ingraham or Rush, to see who is doing what. When some moronic Senator like John McCain makes a stupid, unfounded assertion like when he said the Trump "scandal" is like Watergate, CONTACT that Senator, or representative, and straighten them out
6) Don't be afraid to be informed, and use that knowledge to spread the word. You would be surprised to learn how few people know there is a video of Comey, under oath before Congress just a few days ago, stating that no one at any time ever attempted to get him to stop any investigation. Yet, the purveyors of fabrication are telling us that there is a Comey "memo" stating Trump tried to tell Comey to stop the investigation, and they call it "obstruction of justice".
Get informed through reliable, honest media. Stay informed. And get out there and actually fight back against the forces of evil that inhabit the murky, stinking swamp. You can start by passing along this post.
And don't forget to vote accordingly.
And remember - the Bible clearly states that the deceivers are the Devils henchmen. It's time to choose sides.
/.
Friday, April 28, 2017
A Tribute to Cooper - Much More Than a Dog
Three and a half years ago we met Cooper. A mini schnauzer-pitbull mix, he had been mistreated for 8 long years, and had been used as a "bait dog", purposely made aggressive by people who do not belong in the human race.
The first time I met Coop, he bit me! And whereas we already had four other mini schnauzers and two cats, it did not look like there could possibly be a home with us - a "rescue" that was unlikely to ever be rescued. So, we told the shelter people to take him back - it could not possibly work. And Cooper was destined to be put down.
But the next day we were back at the shelter, to bring the boy home with us. One way or another, Cooper was going to have a loving home for whatever time he had left. We would find a way to make it work.
And work is what it took. But it wasn't long before Cooper came to understand that he finally had a home. A family. And people who loved him. And he loved us back.
The first thing we did was remove the spike collar that had the spikes on the inside, to make it easier to control him. He never saw that monstrosity again. He had a huge yard to romp in, and 13 acres to roam with his new brothers and sisters. And for the next three and a half years, Cooper spent the evenings in my wife's lap, and his days playing, sleepng, and, of course, eating! There was no doubt he was finally happy. He knew he was home. We had rescued him - and he had rescued us!
Lately, Cooper had been losing his senses, which caused him to be easily startled, and was suffering from arthritis. And this would bring out his earlier training as a bait dog - to snap and bite in what he deemed to be self-defense. And we realized, much to our sorrow, that while we were able to rescue Cooper from his present, we could not rescue him from his past.
Having attacked the other dogs and hurting them when he was startled, we knew it was time to let Cooper - that sweet, loving friend - return to the arms of the Lord.
Today we said good-bye to him. We stayed with him to the end. And for the first time in over 60 years I am crying. And my wife is crying, uncontrollably. Crying for Cooper, who was cheated. Crying for us - also cheated. And all because some people who are not worthy of life had ruined so much of his.
We love you, Cooper! And we will forever miss you. And in spite of the hurt we now feel, having you in our lives these last few years has been worth it, in spades!
Good-bye, sweet, loving friend...
/
Monday, April 24, 2017
Dishonest Mainstream Media Shows Its Colors
The headline in bold letters on AOL read:
"Sean Hannity Hit With Scathing Sexual Harassment claims - shocking situation involving a hotel room. Sean Hannity slammed with sexual harassment allegations from former FOX News guest
Story by Marah Alindogan, AOL.com"
The story begins, "After FOX News was forced to let go of its biggest star Bill O'Reilly amid sexual harassment allegations last week, another one of its anchors is facing a scandal of his own. (Ed: No, he is not - this is a blatant, proven lie)
"Conservative pundit Debbie Schlussel claims that Sean Hannity invited her back to his hotel in Detroit after the pair met at a book signing."
The "story" then goes on for several more paragraphs about how Hannity harassed her, and tried to seduce here. All have been proven to be lies, but that does not stop the liberal media that refuses to let the truth interfere with the story they are CREATING.
And only after having put all this into the readers' heads, they THEN state, "Just a couple of days following her radio interview that went viral over the weekend, Schlussel walked back her claims, denying that she was ever sexually harassed by him in an interview:
"I would never accuse him of that. Sexual harassment has a special meaning under the law, and I would never accuse him of that," she clarified. "I never thought I was sexually harassed by Sean Hannity."
What we have here is a classic - and common - example of how the liberal media (AOL in this case) writes a story specifically designed to poison minds by creating false impressions, and then, only in the end of the story, the actual truth comes out. But of course, by that time minds have already been poisoned. It's hard to put a genie back in the bottle. Especially when most readers of lib media only read the headlines, and make up their minds from that. And the liberal media knows that!
Any HONEST journalist would have written the story that "Pundit Falsely Accuses Hannity of Harassment - Then Retracts Her Claims" That would be a truthful headline that would not plant seeds of hate against an innocent person in people's minds.
When will we hold the dishonest liberal media accountable for the hate, discontent and division they intentionally spread?
/
"Sean Hannity Hit With Scathing Sexual Harassment claims - shocking situation involving a hotel room. Sean Hannity slammed with sexual harassment allegations from former FOX News guest
Story by Marah Alindogan, AOL.com"
The story begins, "After FOX News was forced to let go of its biggest star Bill O'Reilly amid sexual harassment allegations last week, another one of its anchors is facing a scandal of his own. (Ed: No, he is not - this is a blatant, proven lie)
"Conservative pundit Debbie Schlussel claims that Sean Hannity invited her back to his hotel in Detroit after the pair met at a book signing."
The "story" then goes on for several more paragraphs about how Hannity harassed her, and tried to seduce here. All have been proven to be lies, but that does not stop the liberal media that refuses to let the truth interfere with the story they are CREATING.
And only after having put all this into the readers' heads, they THEN state, "Just a couple of days following her radio interview that went viral over the weekend, Schlussel walked back her claims, denying that she was ever sexually harassed by him in an interview:
"I would never accuse him of that. Sexual harassment has a special meaning under the law, and I would never accuse him of that," she clarified. "I never thought I was sexually harassed by Sean Hannity."
What we have here is a classic - and common - example of how the liberal media (AOL in this case) writes a story specifically designed to poison minds by creating false impressions, and then, only in the end of the story, the actual truth comes out. But of course, by that time minds have already been poisoned. It's hard to put a genie back in the bottle. Especially when most readers of lib media only read the headlines, and make up their minds from that. And the liberal media knows that!
Any HONEST journalist would have written the story that "Pundit Falsely Accuses Hannity of Harassment - Then Retracts Her Claims" That would be a truthful headline that would not plant seeds of hate against an innocent person in people's minds.
When will we hold the dishonest liberal media accountable for the hate, discontent and division they intentionally spread?
/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)