If She Runs, Why Hillary Could Easily Get The Nomination

The Democrat lineup is getting full - but it's full with far-left nutcases and candidates that just cannot win. Many democrats are hoping Biden can save them, but that, too, would be a stretch.

But Hillary could easily get the nod if she runs, for several reasons:

1) She has a ton of ardent followers ready-made from 2016, who think she was robbed and want her to take a second bite at the apple

2) Hillary is progressive, but not radical far-left like the others. More moderate, she can pull more people to her than any of the others

3) Many on the left see her as the strongest contender, as she did win the popular vote in 2016, and she likely learned to not ignore major states when campaigning

4) She has the funding already, and has big donors in her pocket

Anyone who discounts the real possibility of a second Trump-Hillary match-up would be making a mistake.

Mueller Report - What Democrats Are Overlooking

Robert Mueller was treated by Democrats like an infallible God during his investigation of Trump, with phrases like, "Just wait until the Mueller Report comes in - then we'll have Trump indicted." They were so sure not only because Mueller has a reputation for being the best prosecutor, with great integrity, but also because his team was made up of partisan, anti-trump people, including from the Clinton Team, and they had an unlimited budget and power. They had two years, issued thousands of subpoenas and interviewed several hundred people. Yessir, if  there was any inkling of a crime, they would certainly dig it up.

And for two years we saw exactly that happening. And in spite of all the effort, cost and time, the Special Counsel found exactly - NOTHING! If that team of anti-trumpers could not turn up anything, any sane, rational person would have to say, "Well, I guess there is nothing there" and move on with the People's business.

But not the Democrats in Congress or those running in 2020. All of a sudden they have escaped the asylum and  are now saying  the Mueller Report is bogus, biased in favor of Trump. Really? And now, rather than finally getting back to doing the people's business, they are intent on re-investigating in search of the crimes that the Mueller team was unable to turn up.

Instead of legislating, they are wasting America's time and resources on more bogus investigations to find what just is not there.

Any qualified shrink would say that is derangement. I don't know about you, but I am horrified that America is being represented by deranged people, so intent on damaging the President that they will alienate everyone but their far-left, radical base, and throw away any chance at keeping the power they crave.

America is a great country. Trump has made huge advances, economically and in foreign policy. He is pushing the country forward in spite of the Democrats and corrupt media trying to pull him down. It's time to tell our representatives and senators if they want to take Trump down, do it at the ballot box in two years, but until then to SUPPORT the man who is actually doing the job that needs to be done, instead of trying to be an anchor preventing it.

/

Would YOUR "Popular Vote" Even Count?

Many liberals and several Democrats running for President of the United States are pushing to eliminate the Electoral College because they believe, erroneously, that it cost them the election in 2016. But what would that actually do?

I have written extensively on  the reason and need for the EC, so I won't be redundant here. What this article will focus on is just one thing - if the EC is eliminated, voters in 29 states could no longer be represented - their own "popular votes" simply would be erased. How, you might ask?

California has 39.6 million people, while Wyoming only has 577,000.  In fact, 12 states have more than half the entire population of the country. That means 12 states can choose our leader, and the voters in many other states simply have their votes set aside. And just 5 states, all "blue" states, have one-third of all voters.

The votes in 15 less populated states would be nullified by California, alone. The votes in 6 more states would be voided by New York, alone. Six more nullified by Florida, and 4 states nullified by Massachusetts. Just 4 states could conceivably choose the President. We would no longer be a Republic with a representative government.

If the Electoral College is eliminated, voters in at least 21 states could have their votes sidelined, and voters in 8 additional states could also be in jeopardy.

And, since 12 states could choose our leader, why would candidates even bother to campaign in any of the lesser states? Just campaign in 12 and win elections.

If the Electoral College is eliminated and you live in any of these states, your vote could become meaningless:

SC, AL, CO, LA, KY, CT, OK, OR, NV, UT, KS, AR, IA, MS, WV, NE, RI, ME, NH, ID, HI, MT, WY, ND, SD, VT, DE, DC, AK

And that disparity is exactly why the Founding Fathers created the Electoral College - to insure that the votes in EVERY state are counted.

"Unplanned" - The Left Shows It's Hand On Silencing Pro-Lifer's

The pro-life film, "Unplanned", hits 1000 theaters this week. The liberal film industry gave it an "R" rating, to insure young people can't see it without a parent. Wow! Think of  it - the left has made it possible for a 15 year old girl  to walk into a Planned Parenthood clinic and get an abortion without her parents consent, but she cannot walk into a movie theater and watch a movie about abortion without her parents consent.

This proves what the left is all about - they push liberal agendas and then make sure those in opposition can't speak out and give their side. That is the definition of fascism.

Pelosi Says Dems On Fishing Expedition, Witch Hunt

Most people missed this story because the mainstream media refuses to put it out there. When Nancy Pelosi was asked by a reporter if all these investigations were a wise move, and if there is any evidence, she stated that while there was no evidence, the Democrats, under the guise of "oversight" were using all those investigations to SEEK OUT evidence.

That is exactly what a fishing expedition is, or, as Trump puts it, a witch hunt. Congress should not be wasting time and taxpayer money on investigations for which there is no evidence of a crime. That's putting the cart before the horse. When there is evidence of a crime, then you investigate, not vice versa.

Imagine if someone with unlimited funding who hated you were to dig into every aspect of your life and your past, searching for something to hurt you. They WOULD find something, because no one is perfect. The only perfect person to have ever lived was nailed to a cross 2000 years ago.

None of those "investigations" are for purposes of finding a crime - they are nothing more than opposition research paid for by taxpayer money - which is illegal.

If we are to preserve and protect our country and our freedoms, we need to boot people to the curb when they act in such a hateful, unethical manner.

Nadler - Opposition Research Disguised as Investigations

Jerry Nadler, in charge of the House Oversight Committee is seeking millions of documents from as many as 80+ people ever associated with President Trump, presumably to "find" a crime not in evidence, which is itself unconscionable. And although the Democrats are claiming they are simply performing "oversight", they are only permitted to do so for issues pertaining to actions while in office or during campaigns. It is not legitimate oversight to look into a person's past history prior to elective office. So, just what is the purpose of all these phony investigations for which there has been no evidence of wrongdoing?

Simple - they are performing opposition research for the 2020 Presidential election, and doing so with TAXPAYER money, which is illegal. Anything they dig up that is detrimental to Trump's character will be used to defeat him in 2020, and not used to impeach him - evidence has not turned up any impeachable offense.

In short, the Democrats, led by Jerry Nadler are again attempting to steal an election by illegal means, and disguising it as "oversight". It boggles the mind how any sane, decent American could possibly elect such corrupt people to office over and over again.

Democrats Need To Find A leader To Run

As this is being written there are roughly 30 announced and/or potential Democrat candidates for 2020. But the one thing a lot of folks are missing is, quite simply, none of them are leaders. Consider...

Every one of those wannabe Presidents, when confronted by even ONE radical in their base, has backed down, and conceded to the venom from the far left. Not one has actually stood up and said, "Sorry, but I am my own man/woman and I don't go to the woodshed for anyone. I don't need you to agree with me."

Nope! Not a leader among them. And that is precisely why none of them can beat Trump.

Democrats desperately need to find a true leader, and one whose values are solidly American