"The Interview" - A Conspiracy Theory

If I were a conspiracy theorist, I would be REAL suspicious about how this Sony debacle has gone down. Let's see how it COULD have been...

Sony puts $70 million into a movie that critics say will bomb - no one will see it. What to do? They ask their gurus, and someone says it is possible to MAKE people want to see it. People are just tall kids, and the quickest way to get a kid to do something is to tell him not to, or that he cannot.

But how to do that?

Well, Sony has a guest pass to the White House, being big-time Hollywood donors, so they might ask someone there for help. It is determined that the first step is to have a reason why people CANNOT see the movie. For that they need a villain, and they have one that is built-in - the movie is about Kim Jung Un, hated by every American except Dennis Rodman and Bill De Blasio. So, we make it look like North Korea has threatened us if we show the movie, so our beloved American public will be deprived of seeing the movie.

The NSA is ordered to hack into Sony, releasing a few embarrassing emails, whereupon almost immediately the FBI says they traced it back to North Korea. The stage has been set.

News broadcasts 24/7 puts the movie into the public eye far more effectively than millions spent on PR and advertising. The public is outraged that North Korea is now dictating what movies we can see by threatening 9/11 style attacks if Sony puts the movie out. Suddenly, everyone wants to see the movie, if only to stick a finger in Kim's eye. But they can't - Sony has pulled the movie that was scheduled to open Christmas Day.

All of a sudden, just two days before Christmas, Sony announces they have become brave heroes - they will show the movie on Christmas after all! "Screw North Korea - we don't take orders from that little maggot." Americans will get to see the movie.

And Sony will make a hundred million on a movie that had been destined for the trash barrel.

Of course, that would only be a whacky conspiracy theory...

Right?

Huffington Post Followers Are Fanatics

While I understand that most sane people already know what a farce the Huffington Post is as far as being a "news" outlet, many do not realize that its followers are like rabid dogs. Here is just one example:

HuffPo ran a story about how one of the witnesses at the Ferguson Grand Jury was found to have lied. Sandra McElroy appears to have made up her entire testimony, supporting Darren Wilson.

Fine. She lied. But the trolls at HuffPo began an endless tirade calling for a murder trial for Wilson, and even disbarment for the prosecutor based on that one false testimony by someone simply seeking her 15 minutes of fame.

But what the HuffPo article did NOT disclose, and what those trolls ignore is the simple fact that SIX AFRICAN AMERICAN witnesses who WERE there all backed Wilson's account of what had happened. And they certainly would not lie on behalf of a white police officer.

So HuffPo is knowingly ignoring pertinent facts in order to push their liberal, socialist agenda, and they count on the "useful idiots", as Saul Alinski called them, to push that agenda out into the streets.

If Americans ever decide to smarten up, they will begin suing those who knowingly misrepresent the truth in order to further an agenda, particularly if it results in violence. Then, charlatans like Sharpton, De Blasio, Farrakhan and Huffington would finally be given their just rewards. And in the case of Sharpton and Farrakhan, who actively seek violence while talking peace, prison would be too good for them.

Government Policy Guarantees Ebola Outbreak in U.S.

Everyone who has been paying attention is aware that the government and the CDC has been lying to us about ebola. But the worst part is the stupidity that they show, and that they believe they can fool us, thinking we are as stupid as they.

The CDC and the Obama administration does not want a travel ban of commercial traffic from West Africa. They claim that such a ban would make the ebola situation worse, yet offer no evidence to support that claim. Either they are just plain stupid, or they are being deceptive when they say such a ban would prevent us from going to Africa to fight ebola there.

Just how dumb do they think we are? You can shut off traffic by travelers without shutting down humanitarian medical travel. We can still go to Africa to fight ebola, even if we are preventing travel by ordinary folks. The two are not mutually exclusive.

We can send whatever help we need to, and still prevent any other travelers with a passport stamp from West Africa from boarding any flight to America. We can - and must - do both.

But when morons like those in our government have such a one-track mind as to make them ignorant, we, the people, should stand in unison and tell them what they MUST do if they want to keep their jobs.

Worse yet are the partisan idiots like Rep. Waxman (D) who spend their time blaming ebola on Republicans because of sequestration. What he DOESN'T say is that Republicans voted to give the CDC more money than Obama had even asked for. And he doesn't say that sequestration was Obama's idea, and Harry Reid's Democrat senate allowed it to happen.

Ebola should not be a political football. But it seems that even national security is a political pawn to Democrats.