The Dr. Ford "Timeline"

Dr. Christine Ford has accused Brett Kavanaugh of groping her at a party 36 years ago. She says she wants to testify before Congress. But considering the timeline of events, I am not sure that would be a good idea - and I am unconvinced that she will ever testify.

At the time of the supposed incident, Ms Ford never told anyone. She never filed a criminal complaint. She cannot say where it happened, or when, or how she got home.

Fast forward to 1996, Dr Ford's parents were being foreclosed upon. When the foreclosure entered the court, the judge found in favor of the foreclosing institution and Dr Ford's parents lost their home. That judge was Brett Kavanaugh's mother.

In 2012 or thereabouts Dr Ford apparently sought therapy. It is reported that she had "repressed memories" of the supposed party where she was groped. From what is being reported, she does not appear to have mentioned the name of the groper.

Repressed memories have been shown to be false memories more often than not, as in the case of the person who "remembered" being decapitated, or of alien abductions. But let's assume there was a party and she was groped.

Dr. Ford now sends a letter to Democrats in Congress, stating, apparently, that the "groper" was Brett Kavanaugh. As far as anyone can determine for certain, this may be the first time she associated Kavanaugh with the groping. This seems to be a rather convenient development, considering both Dr Ford and her first attorney (and now her new attorney) are all liberals. In fact, her new attorney, Katz, was filmed last year at a "resistance rally" at which she stated they would fight Republicans to the end.

Dr Ford then puts forth that there was a witness - a boy named Judge who pulled Kavanaugh off her. But Mr Judge says he has no recollection of any such thing. Now Dr Ford says there was another witness - a girl named Keyser. But Ms Keyser also states that she was not present at any such party, and does not recall any such thing happening.

Now, Dr Ford's "resistance attorney" keeps moving the goal post for a senate hearing to iron this out. And she keeps insisting on requirements that are designed to give Kavanaugh no chance to defend himself - a "kangaroo court".

While I cannot prove anything (any more than Dr Ford can), I suspect that this entire story is strictly political. I don't doubt she was groped at a teen party - most girls who go to teen "mixers" do get groped. But I seriously doubt it was by Brett Kavanaugh. I suspect she, being a far left liberal, along with her attorney (a resistance queen) attached Mr Kavanaugh to the story for the sole purpose of destroying any chance of him becoming a Justice on the Supreme Court. And they are dragging this out for the sole purpose of harming Republicans in the mid-terms, with the help of the far left liberal media who side with Dr Ford and automatically believe Kavanaugh to be guilty because that is what they want to believe. And even though Republicans have been bending over backward to accommodate Ms Ford, the media and Democrat politicians, like Gillibrand and Blumenthal, accuse Republicans of "bullying" Dr Ford, simply because they are attempting to help her testify as she said she wanted to do.

I also find it strange that this accusation never cane up when he was appointed to the 2nd highest court 12 years ago, and it never came up in six thorough FBI investigations into  his background.

I also believe that Dr Ford and her attorney are only dragging this out in order to effect maximum damage in the media. It would not surprise me at all if Dr Ford has no intention of testifying at all; that this is just a hit-and-run ambush by the "resistance" movement.

Just my opinion. But right now it's the only one that makes sense, given what few fact we have.